15 Jan

For referenced medical information relating to coronaviruses, here are tens of thousands of independent doctors speaking out on vaccines, tests, statistics put into perspective, and treatments. This site is highly recommended: https://worlddoctorsalliance.com

In the UK, here is a group of doctors and lawyers with information on consent and many templates written for nursing homes, schools and employers etc: www.ukmedfreedom.org

Regarding no masks for children: https://usforthem.co.uk/template-letters/

NON-CONSENT LETTER TEMPLATES to protect children. 

Please see link for following templates by Barrister Tracey O’Mahony: 

1. Non Consent to vaccine for children in school setting.

2. Non Consent to vaccine for children in GP setting. 

3. Non Consent to vaccine for children in vaccination center setting. 




For your healthcare provider or local vaccination centre. Thank you.

Guide to filing a mass criminal complaint. https://theukfreedomalliance.co.uk/blog/the-uk-freedom-alliance-criminal-complaint-initiative.html


Consent must be given voluntarily and freely. The individual must be informed about the process, benefits and risks of immunisation and be able to communicate their decision. Information given should be relevant to the individual patient, properly explained and questions should be answered fully Green Book: Chapter 2 Consent https://buff.ly/3vE67Oe


Forced or coerced vaccination is a violation of:
1) Nuremberg Code
2) UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (art.6).
3) UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 7).
4) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art. 3).
5) Declaration of Helsinki (25)
6) (UK) Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 Section 45 E



UK LAW: The Equality Act 2010 protects individuals from discrimination relating to protected characteristics, which include belief. (2) Belief means any religious or philosophical belief and a reference to belief includes a reference to a lack of belief. An anti-mask or anti-vaccination philosophical stance is a belief, it is therefore protected from discrimination by law. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents


Forwarded from Jonathan Law Channel: UK

'On Monday 17 January, the House of Lords will vote on some of the Government’s most dangerous anti-protest proposals. This is our chance to scrap them for good. Email your MP today, calling on them to make sure their party stands up for people’s democratic rights and votes against the Government’s plans. EMAIL YOUR MP https://action.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/page/92606/action/1?ea.url.id=5705939


Jobs Not Jabs (UK) Group Action for UK Healthcare Sector. 

Our aim is to provide affordable group legal action to all who are impacted by the No Jab No Job policy. If you need help with No Jab No Job, please go to https://jobsnotjabs.uk/

and fill in the questionnaire. Find us on Telegram @ https://t.me/+oPgJpepcsihkY2Y0


Law of the Land v mandates and rules

Forwarded from Outreach WorldWide Info Channel

'Outreach Worldwide Exclusive

Man Proves The Magna Carta Is A Legal Document. 

Outreach Worldwide is proud to present this ground breaking, exclusive video. In February 1995 Essex Fruit Farmer, John Colthorpe took his case against the Masonic Trust to the Court of Appeal where he established the legal validity of Magna Carta & the constitutional status of its Clause 29. Only to see his book about the case banned from sale. 

Listen carefully to the video. It proves that the Magna Carta is a permanent part of the Constitution. Thus the actions of Parliament in passing the Coronavirus Act are unlawful. CLAUSE 29 "No free man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against, except by the lawful judgement of his peers and the law of the land." 

Magna Carta: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/magna-carta/magna-carta-1225-westminster/

FIVE ACTIONS TO SCRAP  THE CORONAVIRUS ACT: https://t.me/outreachworldwide/595


UK worker's rights information:

'Join Workers of England union. Then contact Warren  jurajet@yahoo.com  You are powerless on your own.  That all changes with the support of a Union. This is the only Union fighting this. 



 ‘No Jab No Job’ – WEU leads the way in defending workers rights. Open Letter: CoE asserts vaccination is not mandatory; no-one be pressured/discriminated against for declining. This principle, enshrined in domestic law, makes it inequitable/potentially unlawful for any employer to seek to mandate the vaccine.



These powers will last two years & WILL affect OUR freedom and take away OUR rights. 

Freeman, [7 Feb 2021 at 02:00:49]: Coronavirus Bill: emergency Covid-19 legislation - House of Lords Library.

The bill proposes new laws that would provide the Government, and various public bodies, with powers to manage the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. Ravi Freeman, [7 Feb 2021 at 02:00:49]

The emergency Coronavirus Bill will be rushed through as LAW Today sees the 2nd reading, if passed it will immediately proceed to 3rd and on. And contains the most draconian powers ever proposed in peace-time Britain. It is imperative every adult man and woman checks these out!




The UK People's lawyer has some resources on Medical Tyranny



David Edelman's Common Law Youtube videos - really nicely done: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxbgHmNxODmfpCDV1B8OV2g

And his website:  https://thepeopleslawyeruk.com/about/david-adelman/


UK: Legal letter template for nursing home staff. (more legal lettrs on the legal blog on this site)




Forwarded from Lawyers of Light

'Domestic legislation in UK under the Public Act (Control of Diseases) Act 1984, s45G is a real nasty.'

(1)A justice of the peace may make an order under subsection (2) in relation to a person (“P”) if the justice is satisfied that— (a)P is or may be infected or contaminated, (b)the infection or contamination is one which presents or could present significant harm to human health, (c)there is a risk that P might infect or contaminate others, and (d)it is necessary to make the order in order to remove or reduce that risk. 

(2)The order may impose on or in relation to P one or more of the following restrictions or requirements— (a)that P submit to medical examination; (b)that P be removed to a hospital or other suitable establishment; (c)that P be detained in a hospital or other suitable establishment; (d)that P be kept in isolation or quarantine; (e)that P be disinfected or decontaminated; (f)that P wear protective clothing; (g)that P provide information or answer questions about P's health or other circumstances; (h)that P's health be monitored and the results reported; (i)that P attend training or advice sessions on how to reduce the risk of infecting or contaminating others; (j)that P be subject to restrictions on where P goes or with whom P has contact; (k)that P abstain from working or trading. 

(3)A justice of the peace may make an order under subsection (4) in relation to a person (“P”) if the justice is satisfied that— (a)P is or may be infected or contaminated, (b)the infection or contamination is one which presents or could present significant harm to human health, (c)there is a risk that a related party might infect or contaminate others, and (d)it is necessary to make the order in order to remove or reduce that risk. (4)The order may impose on or in relation to P a requirement that P provide information or answer questions about P's health or other circumstances (including, in particular, information or questions about the identity of a related party). 

(5)“ Related party ” means— (a)a person who has or may have infected or contaminated P, or (b)a person whom P has or may have infected or contaminated. 

(6)An order under this section may also order a person with parental responsibility (within the meaning of the Children Act 1989) for P to secure that P submits to or complies with the restrictions or requirements imposed by the order. 

(7)The appropriate Minister must by regulations make provision about the evidence that must be available to a justice of the peace before the justice can be satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) or (3). 

(8)Any reference in this section to a person who is infected or contaminated includes a reference to a person who carries the source of an infection or contamination, and any reference to infecting or contaminating others includes a reference to passing that source to others.

BUT...   s 45E ...Medical treatment makes clear that regulations may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment. Medical treatment ” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment. One would argue that tests and masks could also fall within this area.'  



May 29th, 2021. London. Hundreds of thousands turned out for freedom and truth. Will that get reported in the media? 


Know what is being planned in the UK: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/cbill_2019-20210122_en_1.htm?fbclid=



NHS - rights to treatment, access to GPs, rights of refusal etc



CPS Admits That "All Offences Charged Under the Coronavirus Act Were Incorrectly Charged"
'A Freedom of Information request has confirmed that zero prosecutions have been made successfully under the Coronavirus Act.
The response, given on Monday by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), reads as follows:
'Since the CPS started its review on finalised cases charged under the Coronavirus Act 2020 (the Act) in April 2020 and up until February 2021, we found that all offences charged under the Act were incorrectly charged, and therefore discontinued because there was insufficient evidence to prove the offences under the Act. There were no cases where a suspect was convicted under the Act as of February 2021.

Coronavirus Laws Prosecutions Wrongfully Enforced https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-laws-prosecutions-wrongful-court-review-b1798423.html
'Every one of the 232 prosecutions brought under the Coronavirus Act was incorrect, with its misuse described as an “embarrassment” to the justice system.'

Dr Reiner Fuellmich, International Lawyer, Nuremberg Court of Human Rights: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FiqBYLsnsqzO/



'First of all, let me say I was wondering how many examples I could find that prove this.  Let us begin with a maxim of law; we are all equal in the eyes of the law. Acts and statues have the force of law when consent is given, why is consent required? Because it is not law! Why is it not law? Because it does not apply to everybody and we are all equal remember. With this in mind here are a few. 

1. Going through a red light. Diplomatic, police / emergency services can do it so it is not law. We are all equal remember what Laws that apply to us must apply to others, uniform does not give special privileges or we would not be equal in the eyes of the Law. (Traffic signs and signals are only advisory; you chose whether or not to use them.

 2. MP'S can smoke in house of commons bar, which is a public place within a building, again it is not law because we are equal to them. If you vote someone to enter into parliament to act as spokesperson for you and then they in turn swear an oath to the queen, who is equal to them, remember you voted them into parliament? You are, so how can they pass acts and statues that can take your rights and put you in jail, and fine you and charge you for parking and travelling on public roads (Public land.) for administrative law, not Criminal Law, which is Common Law. Halsbury Law states that there is no place in the UK for administrative law, (Contract law.)

3. Judges do not pay income tax. again it is not law but requires consent because we are all equal. Why do the Judges not pay taxes or be forced to? They know it is not Law. The queen allowed her family to pay taxes…with consent. 

4. The queen at her coronation swore on oath to up hold “Gods Law according to the Gospel.” Which is Common Law, basically the commandments. Not acts and statues, which clearly are not Law but administrative law. Read “A layman’s guide to the English constitution by Burgess.”

5. Statutes made by governments (politicians) which have made laws that put themselves above the British Constitution for one, and there are perhaps others, are not legal because they do not have royal assent as is required by the Law and British Constitution. This shows that if the correct lawful path is not followed anywhere, where there is a constitution similar to the British situation, it cannot be legal.

6. Also, government and bodies are servants of the people, therefore how can a servant make laws that apply to the master? Tyranny often masquerades as our protector.  If you don’t know your rights, you effectively have no rights. What does our protector do to help us learn our rights so we can defend our rights?  They are rules and policies of the company called UK. Plc. We are deemed employees of the company, therefore so for us to qualify for the company benefits we must follow their rules..'

What is happening in the international criminal courts regarding the world governments implementing the lockdown/mass vaccination agendas? 



COVID Fraud - Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against the W.H.O and World Leaders for 'Crimes against Humanity.'
A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, the WHO & the Davos Group.




Dear Dr. [name],

I am writing to you regarding the COVID-19 vaccination programme, which your surgery has taken a very keen, and entirely unsolicited, interest in promoting to me.

I do not wish to receive a COVID-19 vaccination, nor do I wish to be the recipient of any further communication from you regarding this, or any other, vaccination. If I require a vaccination, I will contact you, just as I would were I to require any other kind of medical attention.

As an intelligent and discerning individual, I am quite well able to conduct research into the various COVID-19 vaccines myself, and make an informed choice. I do not require unsolicited promotional campaigns from you to aid me in my research endeavours, especially not repeated campaigns, which some might construe as a form of harassment.

Having reviewed the available evidence at length, I have made the informed choice not to receive any COVID-19 vaccinations. While I am not required to give you a reason for my decision, as it is my right to decline any medical treatment offered to me for any or no reason, I will elucidate upon my reasons for your interest.

In the first instance, this vaccine - like all vaccines - is capable of causing severe and life-changing impairment and disability. This is confirmed on the Government's website, whereby they state they have structured a compensation programme for those left severely damaged by COVID-19 vaccinations (1).

Leading on from this is the fact that the safety testing around COVID-19 vaccinations is wholly inadequate, lasting as it has only months, when vaccines are typically monitored for years or decades before being introduced to the public.

"Fast-tracking" a vaccine means, by definition, there is no data on long-term safety. COVID-19 infection, if acquired, is mild for most, does not usually require hospital treatment, and the overwhelming majority of people go on to make a full recovery with no lasting ill effects. The same cannot be said for COVID-19 vaccinations, as the data simply is not there to tell us. We may very well find in years to come that the long-term harms of these vaccines far outweigh any benefits, as, of course, has been the case with so many historical medical products.

Please note that eminent authorities in vaccine science have issued stark warnings about the dangers of accelerating vaccine development, for coronaviruses in particular. Whenever this has been attempted in the past, test subjects have developed a syndrome known as "vaccine enhancement", whereby, when they come into contact with the wild virus, they develop far more severe illness than those who did not receive the vaccine. Many test subjects in these trials died (2).

Finally, and as you may or may not be aware, it is in fact a misnomer to call these products "vaccines", as their manufacturers state they do not prevent contraction or transmission of disease. Therefore, they do not "vaccinate". What these products are, in fact, are mRNA gene therapies. Given the accelerated nature of safety testing, they are experimental gene therapies, which are not approved for use, and have been licensed for emergency purposes only (3). I myself do not wish to be a test subject.

Please ensure I do not receive any further communication from your surgery promoting COVID-19, or any other, vaccinations.

Yours sincerely,



(1) https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment/eligibility
(2) https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight/as-pressure-for-coronavirus-vaccine-mounts-scientists-debate-risks-of-accelerated-testing-idUKKBN20Y1I1?edition-redirect=uk
(3) https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3115838/what-are-coronavirus-mrna-vaccines-and-how-do-they-work
Find this letter permanently at: https://miriaf.webs.com/doctors-covid-vaccine

GOV.UK https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment/eligibility
Vaccine Damage Payment
A Vaccine Damage Payment is a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000 if you're severely disabled as a result of vaccination against certain diseases.


From Clare Wills Harrison - Rational Global lawyer.
"As we know the testing is wildly inaccurate. The best thing you can do if you are asked to take a test is use one of the precedent letters decling the same and also perhaps get some knowledge and facts about the accuracy of the same. Here is start with some info": https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/leaked-emails/


Michael O'Bernicia (@TheBernician) Tweeted:
The CPS has recently admitted that not a single criminal charge brought under the Coronavirus Act 2020 has been deemed legally enforceable.
The Act therefore cannot be used to mandate the COVID vaxx or the vaxx passport, since it cannot be used to mandate masks and distancing. https://twitter.com/TheBernician/status/1375429036663508993?s=20




The law on refusing to give name to police in the UK: https://youtu.be/6NeCqOgjpKg




Over the Spring Equinox weekend there were freedom marches around the world. These were minimalised by mainstream media, and many people on social media also condemned the protestors verbally. Police brutality was extreme in some countries, where they attacked the very people defending freedom. In Bristol, UK, it looks like terrorist gangs burnt out police cars and staged it to look like the men and women who had marched peacefully. Here is some evidence of this where the cars has the same licence plate number!!


March 15th, 2021: UK Chief of Police who has been at the helm of undeniable and unwarranted police brutality against the British public: https://www.politicalite.com/latest/dump-dick-calls-grow-for-met-chief-to-quit-as-protesters-hold-scotland-yard-rally/?utm_source=sharebuttons&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=mashshare&fbclid=IwAR1WdM9KMfu0N8oSKJl_3RQ6Juuzuss-UhfAJ3dvEeXtxyEb0cmQUOKBAzE






Feb 26th, 2021: The Telegraph: GOOD NEWS!

Schools told they cannot force pupils to wear masks. Government says children should not be 'denied education' for non-compliance with measures that are voluntary.



Jan. 30th, 2021: EU: note that in these 47 countries, which includes the UK despite Brexit, vaccines are NOT mandatory and those not taking them are NOT to be discriminated against. The relevant article to this is - 7.3.1- https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004/


ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network https://www.icandecide.org/
Our Mission At the Informed Consent Action Network, you are the authority over your health choices and those of your children. In a medical world manipulated by advertising and financial interests, true information is hard to find and often harder to understand. Our goal is to put the power of scientifically researched health...


This is from Miri Anne Finch. UKMFA:







Settlement £7k for mask discriminationhttps://disabilityrights.org.uk/first-face-mask-discrimination-case-nets-7-000



Common Law. Important to understand because this is Land Law/Natural Law/Law of God, and is very simple. It works to protect us all. Maritme Law replaced this, whereby everyone answers to the Crown! Please research:    



Zero prosecutions! UK..........

A Freedom of Information request has confirmed that zero prosecutions have been made successfully under the "Coronavirus Act" they chased people around handing out fines, not one stood as legit in court. https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/05/10/cps-admits-that-all-offences-charged-under-the-coronavirus-act-were-incorrectly-charged/

Learn Common Law Strawman: The Legal / Medical Mafia https://rokfin.com/stream/6203/The-LegalMedical-Mafia-Feat-Clint-Richardson-Truth-Warrior

'Are all men Naturally free, or are men merely some mathematical formulation of value as various forms of voluntary and involuntary slaves, subjects, employees… commodities to be used (employed) for mere sale and extortion? And just how do you decide which men are free and which have value? (Actually, that’s a trick question: you don’t. Your masters do!) Read more https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/

David Whitehead interviews Clint Richardson to discuss his fantastic work on the legal strawman, the real story of your artificial person.  Download the PDF – Strawman http://www.strawmanstory.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Strawman_Story_V1_Final_Free_Download_080617.pdf

WATCH: https://rokfin.com/stream/6203/The-LegalMedical-Mafia-Feat-Clint-Richardson-Truth-Warrior



A Dissident's Guide to the Constitution: Episode 1
How does government work? Who tells government where to stop?

By popular request, and to meet the need of the times, Alex Thomson is joined by Mike Robinson and David Scott to brief dissidents on the Constitution. The podcast will be of interest to overseas listeners too but primarily explores the English and Scots Constitutions, the common law, and the British constitutional legacy.


A Dissident’s Guide to the Constitution: Episode 2 — Common Law
Why does English have the Norman French word “legal” as well as the Anglo-Saxon word “lawful”? Is the law the Crown’s or ours? Is “jury nullification” the most hazardous phrase to utter near a courthouse?


A Dissident’s Guide to the Constitution: Episode 3 — Rights

How come we have such different visceral reactions to the assertions “I am entitled to a house” and “I am immune (https://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/what-has-european-convention-human-rights-ever-done-us) in my house”, even though both entitlements and immunities are kinds of rights? 

Is it really a step forward that the UN has enumerated “rights” in an International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and an International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights? What are the practical effects of Locke’s and Rousseau’s thought-exercise propounding that man is a blank slate? Were our rights won for us (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/22/identity-id-cards-abolished-1952) by being asserted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Willcock#Willcock_v._Muckle) by our forefathers against government, or are they graciously granted by government and then curtailed and withheld again by that same government with a supposedly heavy heart?


A Dissident's Guide to the Constitution: Episode 4 — Democracy: The Books Self-government or the consent of the governed? One or other of these assumptions about democracy must be a sham if the other is valid. Either we are ruling ourselves, or someone else is ruling us, and one or other of these has to be the preferable model. https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/dissidents-guide-constitution-episode-4-—-democracy-books


A Dissident's Guide to the Constitution: Episode 5, Part I — Democracy: a British value?
'The claim is often made that Parliament is sovereign. Often, "Parliament" is taken to mean "not the Crown", or that the Crown should refrain from exercising a political role even if it is grudgingly acknowledged (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/veiled-sceptre/E6C6B2D0F14EA359BDD52F7F9C0D1D73) to have one.
Is it right that the Queen has bowed out of politics (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPTsa6yyiHM)? What was she taught at an impressionable age (https://books.google.com/books?id=pKRjAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA171) (from twelve onwards) about her constitutional role? Why do UK Column News presenters voice consistent scepticism about the proposal of "direct" or "participatory" democracy and the likelihood that those chosen to have their say will be briefed by the Klaus Schwabs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDH0KGQD9vw) of this world? Isn't democracy a Fundamental British Value (https://www.youngcitizens.org/british-values)these days? What did household names C.S. Lewis and Lord Hailsham have to say in the post-war generation about democracy?


Great breakdown of Title 4 flag and Maritime Law.




Strawman - The Nature Of The Cage
The Nature of the Cage is a cutting edge documentary like no other. It highlights the truth around debt, the Legal Fiction, Lawful and Legal, Debt Collectors, Bailiffs, and modern day Policing. The film gives a detailed overview...



And the Magna Carta Article 61! 


German lawyer -  part of a 640 strong medical team - is filing now for crimes against humanity - the biggest since the second world war.  

And a legal case in Canada: 



List of companies insisting on vaccines and masks:



What follows is copied and pasted from an alt source, so please as always, do your own research! 

'Quantas airlines and their protocols for mandatory vaccination in order to fly -  Upon doing some research, here is some very interesting information.
Quantas airlines was privatized in March 1993
British airways buys a majority stake of Quantas airways, 25% at the time worth 665 million.
British airways is owned by International Airlines group
International Airlines Group is one of the largest in the world, it has 598 air craft and carries 118 million people anually
Qatar Airways owns International Airlines Group
After purchasing an additional $600 million in shares, in February 2020, the Qatari Government is now 50% share holder of Qatar Airways.
Qatar is off the coast of Saudi Arabia and is the richest nation in the world, or it was...
Qatar is governed by the Emir
The Emir are the ruling class, long family histories of leaderships and extreme wealth.
The government is a de facto " Absolute Monarchy"
Absolute Monarchy - holds a supreme autocratic authority over its people. They are not restricted or bound by conventional authority. They are not bound by written law, legislation or customs. They pretty much do what ever they want and they have the money to do it. Their wealth originates from oil production and sales
Qatar Investment Authority, takes stake in Vaccine manufacturer Cure Vac. CureVac is making a covid vaccine
Bill Gates is primary stake holder and investor in CureVac.
Quantis will require vaccines!

Gates and CureVac (biomed vaccine)
IAG owns British airways (and others):
Qatar Air, shareholder in IAG
Qatar Airways owned by Gov’t
Qatar takes stake in CureVac and Gates vaccine
Airline now requiring Covid vaccine to travel:


An alternative!


Freedom Airway - #SolutionsWatch
SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=39630


May 28th 2021:

Blood Clots and Flying: What You Should Know
We explain the connection between blood clots and flying, tips for prevention, and what you should know if you have a history of this condition.



We have no more intel than anyone else but Gesara might be happening instead of the threatened Klaus Schwab global reset (communism for us, billionaire control for them). If so... banks and stock market crashes could happen. We don't know. Buying gold or silver could be a good idea - at least some! Bit of info here as of 30th Jan, 2021:  https://operationdisclosure.blogspot.com/2021/01/what-to-expect-rinus-verhagen.html#more


Nuremberg aka post WW2 military court rulings- adopted WORLD WIDE

“The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.”

Police brutality across the world is now horrific... Peaceful protestors set up on and sometimes as many as eight or nine officers attacking a single person, while antifa/blm run riot and nothing happens. These videos are on sites like bitchute and brandnewtube, telegram and gab. What happened????


One UK Cop has had enough, though...  

March, 2021:

'I quit -️I’m a cop of 20 years. and I’m leaving. I’m done.'
An unnamed police officer with 20 years of service has talked about why they have decided to quit the job after two decades of serving the public.
'I’m done with the duplicitous liars and twisters of truth in Parliament, who have destroyed policing in order to further their own careers. I’m done with those charlatans and snake oil salesmen and women who spread their bile, whose acid eats away at society and it’s values and future. I’m done with the utter lack of consequences for their corruption.'



A precedent set re covid rules/laws: 

Feb 26th, 2021: Keith Neale, a 60-year-old homeless man, had his conviction for obstructing a police officer by failing to give his details quashed, by the High Court sitting in Cardiff.

Law Gazette - Covid regulations accused had right of silence.
Appeal finds no implied duty to give details to the police.